Logo image
Operationalizing the learning health care system in an integrated delivery system
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Operationalizing the learning health care system in an integrated delivery system

Wayne A Psek, Rebecca A Stametz, Lisa D Bailey-Davis, Daniel Davis, Jonathan Darer, William A Faucett, Debra L Henninger, Dorothy C Sellers and Gloria Gerrity
EGEMS (Washington, DC), Vol.3(1), pp.1122-1122
03/10/2015
PMID: 25992388

Abstract

Context Learning Health System 2014 EDM Forum Symposium Patient Involvement Delivery System Ethics Health Information Technology
The Learning Health Care System (LHCS) model seeks to utilize sophisticated technologies and competencies to integrate clinical operations, research and patient participation in order to continuously generate knowledge, improve care, and deliver value. Transitioning from concept to practical application of an LHCS presents many challenges but can yield opportunities for continuous improvement. There is limited literature and practical experience available in operationalizing the LHCS in the context of an integrated health system. At Geisinger Health System (GHS) a multi-stakeholder group is undertaking to enhance organizational learning and develop a plan for operationalizing the LHCS system-wide. We present a framework for operationalizing continuous learning across an integrated delivery system and lessons learned through the ongoing planning process. The framework focuses attention on nine key LHCS operational components: Data and Analytics; People and Partnerships; Patient and Family Engagement; Ethics and Oversight; Evaluation and Methodology; Funding; Organization; Prioritization; and Deliverables. Definitions, key elements and examples for each are presented. The framework is purposefully broad for application across different organizational contexts. A realistic assessment of the culture, resources and capabilities of the organization related to learning is critical to defining the scope of operationalization. Engaging patients in clinical care and discovery, including quality improvement and comparative effectiveness research, requires a defensible ethical framework that undergirds a system of strong but flexible oversight. Leadership support is imperative for advancement of the LHCS model. Findings from our ongoing work within the proposed framework may inform other organizations considering a transition to an LHCS.
url
https://doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1122View
Published (Version of record) Open

Metrics

1 Record Views

Details

Logo image